Taj Mahal

Taj Mahal

Thứ Sáu, 31 tháng 12, 2010

Ấn Độ sẽ cấp Visa tại sân bay Ấn Độ cho thêm 4 nước ASEAN vào 1/1/2011

Visa-on-arrival facility for 4 Asean countries
TNN, Dec 31, 2010

NEW DELHI: The government on Thursday (31 Dec. 2010) extended the visa-on-arrival (VOA) facility to four Asean countries, including Laos, Vietnam, the Philippines and Cambodia. The VOA facility will be applicable from January 1, 2011. It will allow travellers single entry facility with a validity of 30 days. Initially, it will be introduced at Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata airports.

A fee of $60 will be charged for each passenger. The VOA facility will be allowed for a maximum of twice in a calendar year to a foreigner with a minimum gap of two months. The facility is non-extendable and non-convertible.

The facility is offered by several south-east Asian countries and is popular with tourists looking for a break. This is in addition to the existing five countries - Japan, Singapore, Finland, Luxembourg and New Zealand - which were extended the facility in January 2010.

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Visa-on-arrival-facility-for-4-Asean-countries/articleshow/7191444.cms; accessed 1 Jan 2011

Giải pháp đối ngoại cho năm 2011 của Thủ tướng Manmohan Singh

PM's New Year resolution: Concentrate on the neighbourhood
Indrani Bagchi, TNN, Dec 30, 2010, 04.29pm IST

NEW DELHI: After entertaining almost 25 heads of state and government in 2010, the Manmohan Singh government's New Year resolution is to concentrate attention on India's immediate neighbours, Indian Ocean and Africa in 2011. Top billing will be given to Nepal and Bangladesh, interestingly, not Pakistan.

Nepal is in a politically catatonic state, with neither the political parties nor the Maoists willing to work on a compromise, leaving the country with virtually no government. With a new ambassador, Jayant Prasad, ready to drive Indian policy in Kathmandu, India will try to push for "free and fair" elections in the Himalayan nation -- where the Maoists contest elections after disarming, so that nobody has an unfair advantage. That has to be the crux of the political deal in Kathmandu, but it has to be done by the Nepalis themselves.

Sources said, India has been approached by different shades of opinion in Nepal asking for intervention, but India continues to hold aloof, because active intervention doesn't make friends among the Nepalis. The foreign minister, SM Krishna is scheduled to visit Kathmandu soon __ after the Maoist leader Baburam Bhattarai visits India next week. But the Indian message remains the same. Maoists have to disarm, following which there can be a political understanding. Bhattarai's visit will be important, for first-hand assessment of current Maoist thinking.

With Bangladesh, the news is a lot more positive. 2010 was a good year for the India-Bangladesh brief, largely due to the proactive role played by the Bangladeshis. In many respects, India has to step up to the plate in the coming year, follow through on the commitments made to Dhaka. Bangladesh wants greater economic openness by India, as well as an equitable agreement on border demarcation. All of this is doable, and at the highest level, the government has put the word out that Bangladesh gets priority. India is hoping to put high level visits by Krishna and perhaps even PM Manmohan Singh.

Pakistan prompts only dismal head shakes in the government. PM has no real maneuvering space on Pakistan, and Pakistan is not ready to play ball either. Yet India continues to get battered by the rest of the world to resume dialogue with Pakistan. Pakistan foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi is scheduled to visit India, and is likely to do so in the next couple of months. But nobody makes any promises on any substantive movement with Pakistan. Of course, another terror attack of moderate intensity will sweep all bets off the table.

Manmohan Singh plans to correct his dismal record of engagement with Africa in 2011. An India-Africa summit is on the cards, though the venue in Africa is yet to be worked out, said sources. Moreover, South Africa is expected to host the IBSA (India, Brazil South Africa) summit in the coming year, and India should be able to plan a number of visits around this event. India has hosted numerous African leaders over the past couple of years, so "now we owe everybody a visit" observed a senior official.

After the Barack Obama visit, India and the US have pledged to work together in Africa. The contours of this engagement will revolve around a couple of things __ replicating India's green revolution experience in Africa and leap-frogging Africa's industrialization to make their exports more relevant in the 21st century. As a number of African leaders have told Singh, they didn't want their countries to be merely sources of raw materials for industrialized nations (read China). So development of capacities, capabilities etc will all be part of India's Africa outreach.

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/PMs-New-Year-resolution-Concentrate-on-the-neighbourhood/articleshow/7190782.cms#ixzz19oRqJOir;

accessed 1 Jan. 2011

Thâm hụt tài khoản vãng lai của Ấn Độ tăng 72% lên 15,8 tỉ USD

Current account deficit surges 72 % to $15.8 b in July-Sept
 
The Hindu




India's current account deficit, representing net flow of income out of the country barring capital movements, surged 72 per cent to $15.8 billion in the July-September quarter over the same period last year.

The increase in current account deficit (CAD) during the period under review is due to higher imports.

This is largely on account of economic recovery and larger payments overseas for certain services, according to the data on Balance of Payments (BoP) released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). In the corresponding period last year, current account deficit stood at $9.2 billion.

The current account deficit, which includes deficit in external trade of goods, services, besides net investment income, stood at 2.9 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) last fiscal, and experts believe that it will increase a bit to 3 per cent of GDP this fiscal. However, if this trend continues, current account deficit may turn out to be much higher than 3 per cent.

The net outflow of money on current account was, however, more than offset by inflow on capital account, despite moderation in foreign direct investment (FDI). Higher capital inflows were due to higher investment in capital markets by foreign funds, external commercial borrowings by India Inc and external assistance, the data showed.

During the July-September quarter, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) put in $18.8 billion, while it was only $7 billion in the same period last fiscal. However, foreign direct investment fell to $2.5 billion during the period under reference from $7.5 billion in the year-ago period.

As external commercial borrowings among other overseas debts rose, India's external debt rose by 12.8 per cent to $295.8 billion in the first half of 2010-11.

With the country receiving more capital inflows than its deficit on current account, there was net accretion of $3.3 billion to foreign exchange reserves.

Current account deficit climbed because imports rose to $177.5 billion from $138.4 billion a year-ago, as economy was on the uptick, reverting to high 8.9 per cent growth in the second quarter of this fiscal. Though exports also rose to $110.5 billion from $82.6 billion, the much higher imports led to trade deficit widening to $66.9 billion from $55.9 billion. The country also received less inflow of money in services and investment income on net basis at $39.1 billion against $42.5 billion in July-September 2009.

This is attributed to higher payments for travel, business and financial services abroad. 
 
Source: http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/article1021266.ece?homepage=true; accessed 1 Jan. 2011

Thứ Tư, 29 tháng 12, 2010

Obama muốn Ấn Độ không chỉ "hướng" mà còn "can dự" ở phía Đông

U.S. President Barack Obama’s Parliament address
November 8, 2010

U.S. President Barack Obama addresses the Parliament in New Delhi on Monday. Photo: AP

 
Text of U.S. President Barack Obama's speech to MPs of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha

Mr. Vice President, Madame Speaker, Mr. Prime Minister, Members of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, and most of all, the people of India.

I thank you for the great honor of addressing the representatives of more than one billion Indians and the world’s largest democracy. I bring the greetings and friendship of the world’s oldest democracy—the U.S.A, including nearly three million proud and patriotic Indian Americans.

Over the past three days, my wife Michelle and I have experienced the beauty and dynamism of India and its people. From the majesty of Humayun’s Tomb to the advanced technologies that are empowering farmers and women who are the backbone of Indian society. From a Diwali celebration with schoolchildren to the innovators who are fueling India’s economic rise. From the university students who will chart India’s future, to you—leaders who helped to bring India to this moment of promise.

At every stop, we have been welcomed with the hospitality for which Indians have always been known. So to you and the people of India, on behalf of me, Michelle and the American people, please accept our deepest thanks. Bahoot dhanyavad.

I am not the first American President to visit India. Nor will I be the last. But I am proud to visit India so early in my presidency. It is no coincidence that India is my first stop on a visit to Asia, or that this has been my longest visit to another country since becoming President.

For in Asia and around the world, India is not simply emerging; India has already emerged. And it is my firm belief that the relationship between the United States and India—bound by our shared interests and values—will be one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century. This is the partnership I have come here to build. This is the vision that our nations can realize together.

My confidence in our shared future is grounded in my respect for India’s treasured past—a civilization that has been shaping the world for thousands of years. Indians unlocked the intricacies of the human body and the vastness of our universe. And it is no exaggeration to say that our information age is rooted in Indian innovations—including the number zero.

India not only opened our minds, she expanded our moral imagination. With religious texts that still summon the faithful to lives of dignity and discipline. With poets who imagined a future “where the mind is without fear and the head is held high.” And with a man whose message of love and justice endures—the Father of your Nation, Mahatma Gandhi.

For me and Michelle, this visit has therefore held special meaning. Throughout my life, including my work as a young man on behalf of the urban poor, I have always found inspiration in the life of Gandhiji and in his simple and profound lesson to be the change we seek in the world. And just as he summoned Indians to seek their destiny, he influenced champions of equality in my own country, including a young Martin Luther King. After making his pilgrimage to India a half century ago, Dr. King called Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violent resistance “the only logical and moral approach” in the struggle for justice and progress.

So we were honored to visit the residence where Gandhi and King both stayed—Mani Bhavan. We were humbled to pay our respects at Raj Ghat. And I am mindful that I might not be standing before you today, as President of the United States, had it not been for Gandhi and the message he shared with America and the world.

An ancient civilization of science and innovation. A fundamental faith in human progress. This is the sturdy foundation upon which you have built ever since that stroke of midnight when the tricolor was raised over a free and independent India. And despite the skeptics who said that this country was simply too poor, too vast, too diverse to succeed, you surmounted overwhelming odds and became a model to the world.

Instead of slipping into starvation, you launched a Green Revolution that fed millions. Instead of becoming dependent on commodities and exports, you invested in science and technology and in your greatest resource—the Indian people. And the world sees the results, from the supercomputers you build to the Indian flag that you put on the moon.

Instead of resisting the global economy, you became one of its engines—reforming the licensing raj and unleashing an economic marvel that has lifted tens of millions from poverty and created one of the world’s largest middle classes.

Instead of succumbing to division, you have shown that the strength of India—the very idea of India—is its embrace of all colors, castes and creeds. It’s the diversity represented in this chamber today. It’s the richness of faiths celebrated by a visitor to my hometown of Chicago more than a century ago—the renowned Swami Vivekananda. He said that, “holiness, purity and charity are not the exclusive possessions of any church in the world, and that every system has produced men and women of the most exalted character.”

And instead of being lured by the false notion that progress must come at the expense of freedom, you built the institutions upon which true democracy depends—free and fair elections, which enable citizens to choose their own leaders without recourse to arms; an independent judiciary and the rule of law, which allows people to address their grievances; and a thriving free press and vibrant civil society which allows every voice to be heard. And this year, as India marks 60 years with a strong and democratic constitution, the lesson is clear: India has succeeded, not in spite of democracy; India has succeeded because of democracy.

Just as India has changed, so too has the relationship between our two nations. In the decades after independence, India advanced its interests as a proud leader of the nonaligned movement. Yet too often, the United States and India found ourselves on opposite sides of a North-South divide and estranged by a long Cold War. Those days are over.

Here in India, two successive governments led by different parties have recognized that deeper partnership with America is both natural and necessary. In the United States, both of my predecessors—one Democrat, one Republican—worked to bring us closer, leading to increased trade and a landmark civil nuclear agreement.

Since then, people in both our countries have asked: what next? How can we build on this progress and realize the full potential of our partnership? That is what I want to address today—the future that the United States seeks in an interconnected world; why I believe that India is indispensable to this vision; and how we can forge a truly global partnership—not in just one or two areas, but across many; not just for our mutual benefit, but for the world’s.

Of course, only Indians can determine India’s national interests and how to advance them on the world stage. But I stand before you today because I am convinced that the interests of the United States—and the interests we share with India—are best advanced in partnership.

The United States seeks security—the security of our country, allies and partners. We seek prosperity—a strong and growing economy in an open international economic system. We seek respect for universal values. And we seek a just and sustainable international order that promotes peace and security by meeting global challenges through stronger global cooperation.

To advance these interests, I have committed the United States to comprehensive engagement with the world, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. And a central pillar of this engagement is forging deeper cooperation with 21st century centers of influence—and that includes India.

Now, India is not the only emerging power in the world. But the relationship between our countries is unique. For we are two strong democracies whose constitutions begin with the same revolutionary words—“We the people.” We are two great Republics dedicated to the liberty, justice and the equality of all people. And we are two free market economies where people have the freedom to pursue ideas and innovations that can change the world. This is why I believe that India and America are indispensable partners in meeting the challenges of our time.

Since taking office, I’ve therefore made our relationship a priority. I was proud to welcome Prime Minister Singh for the first official state visit of my presidency. For the first time ever, our governments are working together across the whole range of common challenges we face. And let me say it as clearly as I can: the United States not only welcomes India as a rising global power, we fervently support it, and we have worked to help make it a reality.

Together with our partners, we have made the G20 the premier forum for international economic cooperation, bringing more voices to the table of global economic decision-making, including India. We have increased the role of emerging economies like India at international financial institutions. We valued India’s important role at Copenhagen, where, for the first time, all major economies committed to take action to confront climate change—and to stand by those actions. We salute India’s long history as a leading contributor to United Nations peacekeeping missions. And we welcome India as it prepares to take its seat on the United Nations Security Council.

In short, with India assuming its rightful place in the world, we have an historic opportunity to make the relationship between our two countries a defining partnership of the century ahead. And I believe we can do so by working together in three important areas.

First, as global partners we can promote prosperity in both our countries. Together, we can create the high-tech, high-wage jobs of the future. With my visit, we are now ready to begin implementing our civil nuclear agreement. This will help meet India’s growing energy needs and create thousands of jobs in both our countries.

We need to forge partnerships in high-tech sectors like defense and civil space. So we have removed Indian organizations from our so-called “entity list.” And we’ll work to reform our controls on exports. Both of these steps will ensure that Indian companies seeking high-tech trade and technologies from America are treated the same as our closest allies and partners.

We can pursue joint research and development to create green jobs; give Indians more access to cleaner, affordable energy; meet the commitments we made at Copenhagen; and show the possibilities of low-carbon growth.

Together, we can resist the protectionism that stifles growth and innovation. The United States remains—and will continue to remain—one of the most open economies in the world. And by opening markets and reducing barriers to foreign investment, India can realize its full economic potential as well. As G20 partners, we can make sure the global economic recovery is strong and durable. And we can keep striving for a Doha Round that is ambitious and balanced—with the courage to make the compromises that are necessary so global trade works for all economies.

Together, we can strengthen agriculture. Cooperation between Indian and American researchers and scientists sparked the Green Revolution. Today, India is a leader in using technology to empower farmers, like those I met yesterday who get free updates on market and weather conditions on their cell phones. And the United States is a leader in agricultural productivity and research. Now, as farmers and rural areas face the effects of climate change and drought, we’ll work together to spark a second, more sustainable Evergreen Revolution.

Together, we’re going to improve Indian weather forecasting systems before the next monsoon season. We aim to help millions of Indian farming households save water and increase productivity; improve food processing so crops don’t spoil on the way to market; and enhance climate and crop forecasting to avoid losses that cripple communities and drive up food prices.

And as part of our food security initiative, we’re going to share India’s expertise with farmers in Africa. This is an indication of India’s rise—that we can now export hard-earned expertise to countries that see India as a model for agricultural development. And that’s another powerful example of how American and Indian partnership can address an urgent global challenge.

Because the wealth of a nation also depends on the health of its people, we’ll continue to support India’s efforts against diseases like tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, and as global partners, we’ll work to improve global health by preventing the spread of pandemic flu. And because knowledge is the currency of the 21st century, we’ll increase exchanges between our students, colleges and universities, which are among the best in the world.

As we work to advance our shared prosperity, we can partner to address a second priority—our shared security. In Mumbai, I met with the courageous families and survivors of that barbaric attack. And here in this Parliament, which was itself targeted because of the democracy it represents, we honor the memory of all those who have been taken from us, including American citizens on 26/11 and Indian citizens on 9/11.

This is the bond we share. It’s why we insist that nothing ever justifies the slaughter of innocent men, women and children. It’s why we’re working together, more closely than ever, to prevent terrorist attacks and to deepen our cooperation even further. And it’s why, as strong and resilient societies, we refuse to live in fear, we will not sacrifice the values and rule of law that defines us, and we will never waver in the defense of our people.

America’s fight against al Qaeda and its terrorist affiliates is why we persevere in Afghanistan, where major development assistance from India has improved the lives of the Afghan people. We’re making progress in our mission to break the Taliban’s momentum and to train Afghan forces so they can take the lead for their security. And while I have made it clear that American forces will begin the transition to Afghan responsibility next summer, I have also made it clear that America’s commitment to the Afghan people will endure. The United States will not abandon the people of Afghanistan—or the region—to the violent extremists who threaten us all.

Our strategy to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda and its affiliates has to succeed on both sides of the border. That is why we have worked with the Pakistani government to address the threat of terrorist networks in the border region. The Pakistani government increasingly recognizes that these networks are not just a threat outside of Pakistan—they are a threat to the Pakistani people, who have suffered greatly at the hands of violent extremists.

And we will continue to insist to Pakistan's leaders that terrorist safe-havens within their borders are unacceptable, and that the terrorists behind the Mumbai attacks be brought to justice. We must also recognize that all of us have and interest in both an Afghanistan and a Pakistan that is stable, prosperous and democratic—and none more so than India.

In pursuit of regional security, we will continue to welcome dialogue between India and Pakistan, even as we recognize that disputes between your two countries can only be resolved by the people of your two countries.

More broadly, India and the United States can partner in Asia. Today, the United States is once again playing a leadership role in Asia—strengthening old alliances; deepening relationships, as we are doing with China; and we’re reengaging with regional organizations like ASEAN and joining the East Asia summit—organizations in which India is also a partner. Like your neighbors in Southeast Asia, we want India to not only “look East,” we want India to “engage East”—because it will increase the security and prosperity of all our nations.

And as two global leaders, the United States and India can partner for global security—especially as India serves on the Security Council over the next two years. Indeed, the just and sustainable international order that America seeks includes a United Nations that is efficient, effective, credible and legitimate. That is why I can say today—in the years ahead, I look forward to a reformed U.N. Security Council that includes India as a permanent member.

Now, let me suggest that with increased power comes increased responsibility. The United Nations exists to fulfill its founding ideals of preserving peace and security, promoting global cooperation, and advancing human rights. These are the responsibilities of all nations, but especially those that seek to lead in the 21st century. And so we look forward to working with India—and other nations that aspire to Security Council membership—to ensure that the Security Council is effective; that resolutions are implemented and sanctions enforced; and that we strengthen the international norms which recognize the rights and responsibilities of all nations and individuals.

This includes our responsibility to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Since I took office, the United States has reduced the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy, and agreed with Russia to reduce our arsenals. We have put preventing nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism at the top of our nuclear agenda, and strengthened the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime—the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Together, the United States and India can pursue our goal of securing the world’s vulnerable nuclear materials. We can make it clear that even as every nation has the right to peaceful nuclear energy, every nation must also meet its international obligations—and that includes the Islamic Republic of Iran. And together, we can pursue a vision that Indian leaders have espoused since independence—a world without nuclear weapons.

This leads me to the final area where our countries can partner—strengthening the foundations of democratic governance, not only at home but abroad.

In the United States, my administration has worked to make government more open and transparent and accountable to the people. Here in India, you’re harnessing technologies to do the same, as I saw yesterday. Your landmark Right to Information Act is empowering citizens with the ability to get the services to which they’re entitled and to hold officials accountable. Voters can get information about candidates by text message. And you’re delivering education and health care services to rural communities, as I saw yesterday when I joined an e-panchayat with villagers in Rajasthan.

Now, in a new collaboration on open government, our two countries are going to share our experience, identify what works, and develop the next-generation of tools to empower citizens. And in another example of how American and Indian partnership can address global challenges, we’re going to share these innovations with civil society groups and countries around the world. We’re going to show that democracy, more than any other form of government, delivers for the common man—and woman.

Likewise, when Indians vote, the whole world watches. Thousands of political parties. Hundreds of thousands of polling centers. Millions of candidates and poll workers, and 700 million voters. There’s nothing like it on the planet. There is so much that countries transitioning to democracy could learn from India’s experience; so much expertise that India could share with the world. That, too, is what’s possible when the world’s largest democracy embraces its role as a global leader.

As the world’s two largest democracies, we must also never forget that the price of our own freedom is standing up for the freedom of others. Indians know this, for it is the story of your nation. Before he ever began his struggle for Indian independence, Gandhi stood up for the rights of Indians in South Africa. Just as others, including the United States, supported Indian independence, India championed the self-determination of peoples from Africa to Asia as they too broke free from colonialism. And along with the United States, you’ve been a leader in supporting democratic development and civil society groups around the world. This, too, is part of India’s greatness.

Every country will follow its own path. No one nation has a monopoly on wisdom, and no nation should ever try to impose its values on another. But when peaceful democratic movements are suppressed—as in Burma—then the democracies of the world cannot remain silent. For it is unacceptable to gun down peaceful protestors and incarcerate political prisoners decade after decade. It is unacceptable to hold the aspirations of an entire people hostage to the greed and paranoia of a bankrupt regime. It is unacceptable to steal an election, as the regime in Burma has done again for all the world to see.

Faced with such gross violations of human rights, it is the responsibility of the international community—especially leaders like the United States and India—to condemn it. If I can be frank, in international fora, India has often avoided these issues. But speaking up for those who cannot do so for themselves is not interfering in the affairs of other countries. It’s not violating the rights of sovereign nations. It’s staying true to our democratic principles. It’s giving meaning to the human rights that we say are universal. And it sustains the progress that in Asia and around the world has helped turn dictatorships into democracies and ultimately increased our security in the world.

Promoting shared prosperity. Preserving peace and security. Strengthening democratic governance and human rights. These are the responsibilities of leadership. And, as global partners, this is the leadership that the United States and India can offer in the 21st century. Ultimately, however, this cannot be a relationship only between presidents and prime ministers, or in the halls of this parliament. Ultimately, this must be a partnership between our peoples. So I want to conclude by speaking directly to the people of India watching today.

In your lives, you have overcome odds that might have overwhelmed a lesser country. In just decades, you have achieved progress and development that took other nations centuries. And now you are assuming your rightful place as a leader among nations. Your parents and grandparents imagined this. Your children and grandchildren will look back on this. But only you—this generation of Indians—can seize the possibility of this moment.

As you carry on with the hard work ahead, I want every Indian citizen to know: the United States of America will not simply be cheering you on from the sidelines. We will be right there with you, shoulder to shoulder. Because we believe in the promise of India. And we believe that the future is what we make it.

We believe that no matter who you are or where you come from, every person can fulfill their God-given potential, just as a Dalit like Dr. Ambedkar could lift himself up and pen the words of the Constitution that protects the rights of all Indians.

We believe that no matter where you live—whether a village in Punjab or the bylanes of Chandni Chowk…an old section of Kolkata or a new high-rise in Bangalore—every person deserves the same chance to live in security and dignity, to get an education, to find work, and to give their children a better future.

And we believe that when countries and cultures put aside old habits and attitudes that keep people apart, when we recognize our common humanity, then we can begin to fulfill the aspirations we share. It’s a simple lesson contained in that collection of stories which has guided Indians for centuries—the Panchtantra. And it’s the spirit of the inscription seen by all who enter this great hall: ‘That one is mine and the other a stranger is the concept of little minds. But to the large-hearted, the world itself is their family.”

This is the story of India; it’s the story of America—that despite their differences, people can see themselves in one another, and work together and succeed together as one proud nation. And it can be the spirit of the partnership between our nations—that even as we honor the histories which in different times kept us apart, even as we preserve what makes us unique in a globalized world, we can recognize how much we can achieve together.

And if we let this simple concept be our guide, if we pursue the vision I have described today—a global partnership to meet global challenges—then I have no doubt that future generations—Indians and Americans—will live in a world that is more prosperous, more secure, and more just because of the bonds that our generation forged today.

Thank you, Jai Hind!, and long live the partnership between India and the United States.


(Source: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article874394.ece; accessed 29 Dec. 2010)

Thứ Hai, 27 tháng 12, 2010

Hơn 17.000 nông dân Ấn Độ tự tử năm 2009

17,368 farm suicides in 2009

P. Sainath
The Hindu
MUMBAI, December 27, 2010
Wife of a distressed farmer (portrait in background) who committed suicide in Waniyavatnal, Maharashtra. At least 17,368 farmers killed themselves in 2009, the worst figure for farm suicides in six years. File Photo: P. Sainath


Worst figure in six years

At least 17,368 Indian farmers killed themselves in 2009, the worst figure for farm suicides in six years, according to data of the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). This is an increase of 1,172 over the 2008 count of 16,196. It brings the total farm suicides since 1997 to 2,16,500. The share of the Big 5 States, or ‘suicide belt' — Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh — in 2009 remained very high at 10,765, or around 62 per cent of the total, though falling nearly five percentage points from 2008. Maharashtra remained the worst State for farm suicides for the tenth successive year, reporting 2,872. Though that is a fall of 930, it is still 590 more than in Karnataka, second worst, which logged 2,282 farm suicides.

Economist K. Nagaraj, author of the biggest study on Indian farm suicides, says, “That these numbers are rising even as the farmer population shrinks, confirms the agrarian crisis is still burning.”

Maharashtra has logged 44,276 farm suicides since 1997, over a fifth of the total 2,16,500. Within the Big 5, Karnataka saw the highest increase of 545 in 2009. Andhra Pradesh recorded 2,414 farm suicides — 309 more than in 2008. Madhya Pradesh (1,395) and Chhattisgarh (1,802) saw smaller increases of 16 and 29. Outside the Big 5, Tamil Nadu doubled its tally with 1,060, against 512 in 2008. In all, 18 of 28 States reported higher farm suicide numbers in 2009. Some, like Jammu and Kashmir or Uttarakhand, saw a negligible rise. Rajasthan, Kerala and Jharkhand saw increases of 55, 76 and 93. Assam and West Bengal saw higher rises of 144 and 295. NCRB farm data now exist for 13 years. In the first seven, 1997-2003, there were 1,13,872 farm suicides, an average of 16,267 a year.

In the next six years 1,02,628 farmers took their lives at an average of 17,105 a year. This means, on average, around 47 farmers — or almost one every 30 minutes — killed themselves each day between 2004 and 2009.

Lower their average

Among the major States, only a few including Karnataka, Kerala and West Bengal avoided the sharp rise these six years and lowered their average by over 350 compared to the 1997-2003 period.

In the same period, the annual average of farm suicides in the Big 5 States as a whole was more than 1,650 higher than it was in 1997-2003.

(Source: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/columns/sainath/article995824.ece?homepage=true; accessed 28 Dec. 2010)

Thứ Sáu, 24 tháng 12, 2010

Mỹ mang Con đường tơ lụa đến với Ấn Độ

U.S. brings Silk Road to India

M. K. Bhadrakumar
The Hindu
Petroleum Minister Murli Deora, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, Turkmen President Gurbanguli Berdymukhamedov and Afghan President Hamid Karzai pose for a photo during the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project meeting in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.


TAPI is in actuality a Silk Road project connecting Central Asia to the West via Gwadar, which will make Pakistan the U.S.'s gateway to Central Asia.

The significance of the signing of the intergovernmental agreement on the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project (TAPI) on December 11 in Ashgabat cannot be overstated. It can only be captured if one says with a touch of swagger that TAPI has been the most significant happening in the geopolitics of the region in almost a decade since America invaded Afghanistan.

The heart of the matter is that TAPI is a Silk Road project, which holds the key to modulating many complicated issues in the region. It signifies a breakthrough in the longstanding U.S. efforts to access the fabulous mineral wealth of the Caspian and the Central Asian region. Afghanistan forms a revolving door for TAPI and its stabilisation becomes the leitmotif of the project. TAPI can meet the energy needs of Pakistan and India. The U.S. says TAPI holds the potential to kindle Pakistan-India amity, which could be a terrific thing to happen. It is a milestone in the U.S.' “Greater Central Asia” strategy, which aims at consolidating American influence in the region.

Washington has been the patron saint of the TAPI concept since the early 1990s when the Taliban was conceived as its Afghan charioteer. The concept became moribund when the Taliban was driven away from Kabul. Now the wheel has come full circle with the incremental resuscitation of the project since 2005 running parallel to the Taliban's fantastic return to the Afghan chessboard. The proposed commissioning of TAPI coincides with the 2014 timeline for ending the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation's “combat mission” in Afghanistan. The U.S. “surge” is concentrating on the Helmand and Kandahar provinces, through which TAPI will eventually run. What stunning coincidences!

In sum, TAPI is the finished product of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Its primary drive is to consolidate the U.S. political, military and economic influence in the strategic high plateau that overlooks Russia, Iran, India, Pakistan and China.

TAPI capitalises on Turkmenistan's pressing need to find new markets for its gas exports. With the global financial downturn and the fall in Europe's demand for gas, prices crashed. Russia cannot afford to pay top dollar for the Turkmen gas, nor does it want the 40 bcm gas it previously contracted to purchase annually. Several large gasfields are coming on line in Russia, which will reduce its need for the Turkmen gas. The Yamal Peninsula deposit alone is estimated to hold roughly 16 trillion cubic metres of gas. But Turkmenistan sits on the world's fourth-largest gas reserves and has its own plans to increase production to 230 bcm annually by 2030. It desperately needs to find markets and build new pipelines.

Thus, Ashgabat is driven by a combination of circumstances to adopt an energy-export diversification policy. In the recent months, the Turkmen leadership evinced interest in trans-Caspian projects but it will remain a problematic idea as long as the status of Caspian Sea remains unsettled. Besides, Turkmenistan has unresolved territorial disputes with Azerbaijan. In November, a second Turkmen-Iranian pipeline went on stream and there is potential to increase exports up to 20 bcm. But then, there are limits to expanding energy exports to Iran or to using Iran as a “regional gas hub” — for the present, at least.

Therefore, Turkmen authorities began robustly pushing for TAPI. The projected 2000-km pipeline at an estimated cost of $7.6 billion will traverse Afghanistan (735 km) and Pakistan (800 km) to reach India. Its initial capacity will be around 30 bcm but that could be increased to meet higher demand. India and Pakistan have shown interest in buying 70 bcm annually. TAPI will be fed by the Doveletabad field, which used to supply Russia.

Ashgabat did smart thinking to accelerate TAPI. The U.S. encouraged Turkmenistan to estimate that this is an enterprise whose time has come. Funding is not a problem. The U.S. has lined up the Asian Development Bank. An international consortium will undertake construction of the pipeline. A curious feature is that the four governments have agreed to “outsource” the execution and management of the project. The Big Oil sees great prospects to participate. The Afghan oilfields can also be fed into TAPI. Kabul awarded its first oil contract in the Amu Darya Basin this week. The gravy train may have begun moving in the Hindu Kush.

On the map, the TAPI pipeline deceptively shows India as its final destination. What is overlooked, however, is that it can easily be extended to the Pakistani port of Gwadar and connected with European markets, which is the core objective. The geopolitics of TAPI is rather obvious. Pipeline security is going to be a major regional concern. The onus is on each of the transit countries. Part of the Afghan stretch will be buried underground as a safeguard against attacks and local communities will be paid to guard it. But then, it goes without saying Kabul will expect the U.S. and NATO to provide security cover, which, in turn, necessitates a long-term western military presence in Afghanistan. Without doubt, the project will lead to a strengthening of the U.S. politico-military influence in South Asia.

The U.S. brought heavy pressure on New Delhi and Islamabad to spurn the Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline project. The Indian leadership buckled under American pressure while dissimulating freedom of choice. Pakistan did show some defiance for a while. Anyhow, the U.S. expects that once Pakistanis and Indians begin to chew the TAPI bone, they will cast the IPI into the dustbin. Pakistan has strong reasons to pitch for TAPI as it can stave off an impending energy crisis. TAPI is in actuality a Silk Road project connecting Central Asia to the West via Gwadar, which will make Pakistan the U.S. gateway to Central Asia. Pakistan rightly estimates that alongside this enhanced status in the U.S. regional strategy comes the American commitment to help its economy develop and buttress its security needs in the long-term.

India's diligence also rests on multiple considerations. Almost all reservations Indian officials expressed from time to time for procrastinating on the IPI's efficacy hold good for TAPI too - security of the pipeline, uncertainties in India-Pakistan relationship, cost of gas, self-sufficiency in India's indigenous production, etc. But the Indian leadership is visibly ecstatic about TAPI. In retrospect, what emerges from the dense high-level political and diplomatic traffic between Delhi and Ashgabat in the recent years is that our government knew much in advance that the U.S. was getting ready to bring TAPI out of the woodwork at some point - depending on the progression of the Afghan war - and that it would expect Delhi to play footsie.

Even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh found time to visit the drab Turkmen capital in a notable departure from his preoccupations with the Euro-Atlantic world. The wilful degradation of India-Iran ties by the present government and Dr. Singh's obstinate refusal to visit Iran also fall into perspective. Plainly put, our leadership decided to mark time and simply wait for TAPI to pop out of Uncle Sam's trouser pocket and in the meantime it parried, dissimulated and outright lied by professing interest in the IPI. The gullible public opinion was being strung along.

To be sure, TAPI is a big-time money-spinner and our government's energy pricing policies are notoriously opaque. Delhi will be negotiating its gas price “separately” with Ashgabat on behalf of the private companies which handle the project. That is certain to be the mother of all energy “negotiations” involving two countries, which figure at the bottom of the world ranking by Transparency International.

Energy security ought to have been worked out at the regional level. There was ample scope for it. The IPI was a genuine regional initiative. TAPI is being touted as a regional project by our government but it is quintessentially a U.S.-led project sheltered under Pax Americana, which provides a political pretext for the open-ended western military presence in the region. As long as foreign military presence continues in India's southwestern region, there will be popular resistance and that will make it a breeding ground for extremist and terrorist groups. India is not only shying away from facing this geopolitical reality but, in its zest to secure “global commons” with the U.S, is needlessly getting drawn into the “new great game.” Unsurprisingly, Delhi no more calls for a neutral Afghanistan. It has lost its voice, its moral fibre, its historical consciousness.

Finally, TAPI is predicated on the U.S. capacity to influence Pakistan. Bluntly speaking, TAPI counts on human frailties - that pork money would mellow regional animosities. But that is a cynical assumption to make about the Pakistani military's integrity.

(The writer is a former diplomat.)

(Source: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article972541.ece?homepage=true; accessed 25 Dec. 2010)

Ấn Độ sẽ ký các hiệp định thương mại với Nhật Bản, Malaysia và EU vào nửa đầu năm 2011

India to sign trade pact with Japan, Malaysia and EU in first half of 2011
 
The Hindu
December 24, 2010

India will open its trade in goods and services with Malaysia, Japan and the European Union in the first half of 2011, Union Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma said here.


Talking to newsmen here, Mr. Sharma said the first half of next year would witness signing of comprehensive market and investment promotion agreements with Japan, Malaysia and the EU. India has already signed a framework agreement for the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) with Malaysia and concluded negotiations for a similar pact with Japan

With the EU, which has a bilateral trade of $76 billion with India, differences had cropped up on the level of opening of the market, dairy farming, issues pertaining to child labour and environment. After the India-EU summit attended by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Brussels on December 9, the negotiations have been intensified and are likely to be concluded by March next with a formal agreement coming by spring time. Mr. Sharma informed that India had launched negotiations for comprehensive economic partnership agreement with New Zealand and Canada. India had already entered into comprehensive market opening pacts with Singapore, South Korea and 10-nation economic bloc ASEAN.

Similarly, Mr. Sharma said a national policy aimed at making India a manufacturing hub leading to creation of more jobs and boosting economic growth would roll out by the end of next month. “We are in dialogue with the Planning Commission and it is my expectation that by the end of January 2011, we should be able to roll out the National Manufacturing Policy,'' Mr. Sharma said.

He said the new policy seeks to attract high-technology from advanced economies. “Our aim is to make India one of the manufacturing hubs. It will create jobs and boost economic growth,'' he remarked. Mr. Sharma said the Commerce Ministry had recently sent out a note for inter-Ministerial consultation for formulating the policy.

(Source: http://www.thehindu.com/business/article977131.ece; accessed 25 Dec. 2010)

Thứ Ba, 21 tháng 12, 2010

Indo-Russian documents concluded during the Annual Summit 2010

Fact sheet on Indo-Russian documents concluded during the Annual Summit 2010

December 21, 2010

List of Documents signed on 21 December 2010 in the presence of Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and Russian President Mr. Dmitry Medvedev
S. No. Name of the Agreement/ MOU Scope of the Agreement/ MOU Russian Signatory Indian Signatory
  1.  
Memorandum on Mutual Understanding and Cooperation in the Field of Elections between the Election Commission of India and the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation The MOU envisages exchange of information and expertise on best practices in the field of elections. Mr. Vladimir Churov, Chairman, Central Election Commission Shri S.Y. Quraishi, Chief Election Commissioner
  1.  
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Russian Federation on cooperation in the field of emergency management The Agreement envisages exchange of information and expertise, and capacity building in the fields of disaster forecasting and disaster management. Mr. Sergey Lavrov, Foreign Minister Shri P. Chidambaram, Home Minister
  1.  
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Russian Federation on Mutual Simplification of Travel Documents for Certain Categories of Nationals of the Republic of India and the Russian Federation The MOU envisages establishment of simplified procedures for expeditious issuance of visas to citizens holding non-diplomatic/ non-official passports travelling to and transiting through each other’s countries for purposes of business, tourism, conferences and seminars. Mr. Sergey Lavrov, Foreign Minister Shri S. M. Krishna, External Affairs Minister
  1.  
Inter-Governmental Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Russian Federation for Enhancement of Cooperation in Oil and Gas Sector  The Agreement is expected to provide an administrative framework for joint undertaking of projects in the oil and gas sector in India, Russia and third countries by the oil and gas companies from both countries. Mr. Sergey Shmatko, Minister of Energy Shri Murli Deora, Minister of Petroleum & Natural Gas
  1.  
Integrated Long Term Programme of Cooperation in Science, Technology & Innovation between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Russian Federation The document will guide innovation-led R&D collaboration in the field of science & technology during the period 2011-2020. Mr. Andrey Fursenko, Minister of Education & Science Shri Kapil Sibal, Minister of S&T
  1.  
Joint Work Document for
Establishing of the Indian - Russian Scientific and Technological Centre
Between Department of Science & Technology, Government of the Republic of India and Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
The document lays down the legal and administrative framework for the establishment of Joint R&D Centers in New Delhi and Mosow that will pioneer commercialisation of joint research outcomes. Mr. Andrey Fursenko, Minister of Education & Science Shri Kapil Sibal, Minister of S&T
  1.  
Memorandum of Mutual Understanding on Combating Irregular Migration between the Government of India and the Government of the Russian Federation The MOU will provide a framework for checking irregular migration. Mr. Kosntantin Romodanovsky, Director, Federal Migration Service Shri G. K. Pillai, Home Secretary
  1.  
Memorandum of Understanding between the State Atomic Energy Corporation "Rosatom" and the Department of Atomic Energy of the Government of India Concerning Broader Scientific and Technical Cooperation The MOU envisages joint research and development in reactor technology and related fields for peaceful uses of atomic energy by nuclear research institutes on both sides. Mr. Sergey Kirienko, Director General, State Corporation on Atomic Energy “ROSATOM” Shri Srikumar Banerjee,  Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy and Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission
  1.  
MOU between Ministry of Communications & Information Technology  (Department of Information Technology) of the Republic of India and the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation on Cooperation in Information Technology
 
The MOU envisages enhanced cooperation in the area of IT and IT-Enabled Services. Mr. Illya Massukh, Deputy Minister, Telecom and Mass Communications Shri Shashi Kant Sharma, Secretary, Information Technology
  1.  
Memorandum of Understanding on cooperation in the Pharmaceutical Sector between the
Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers of the Government of India and the Ministry of Trade & Industry of the Government of Russian Federation
The MOU envisages enhanced cooperation in the area of pharmaceuticals and bio-pharmaceuticals, inter alia through establishment of JVs, joint research and exchange of know-how. Mr. Denis Manturov, Deputy Minister of Industry & Trade Shri Mukul Joshi, Secretary, Pharmaceuticals
  1.  
Framework Agreement on Cooperation in Hydrocarbon Sector between ONGC Videsh Ltd. and JSFC Sistema The Agreement provides a framework for cooperation between the two companies for undertaking joint projects in the hydrocarbon sector Mr. Vladimir Evtushenkov, Chairman,
Sistema
Mr. R. S. Butola,
Managing Director, OVL


List of G2G/B2B documents, being concluded on the margins of the Annual Summit

Political

  1.  
Joint Statement: Celebrating a Decade of the India- Russian Federation Strategic Partnership and Looking Ahead The Joint Statement is the principal political outcome document of the Summit. It summarises the Summit discussions on bilateral, regional and global issues.


Defence

  1.  
Preliminary Design Contract (PDC) for Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) The contract envisages joint design and development of Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft with the involvement of HAL on the Indian side and Sukhoi Design Bureau and   Rosoboronexport on the Russian side.
Trade/Banking

  1.  
MOU between Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) and Federal Customs Service on Exchange of Information on Foreign Trade The MOU will strengthen the regulatory framework for monitoring bilateral trade.
  1.  
MOU between SBI and Vnesheconombank on banking sector cooperation The MOU will contribute to further strengthening of banking linkages between the two countries.
  1.  
MOU between EXIM Bank and Vnesheconombank to operationalise the USD 100 million LOC signed during December 2009 Summit. The MOU will facilitate the utilisation of the USD 100 million LOC extended by EXIM Bank through Vnesheconombank in December 2009. The LOC is to be utilised for enhancing exports from India to Russia, especially by SMEs.
  1.  
Opening of Official Representative Office of OJSC “Gazprombank” in India This will contribute to the ongoing efforts to strengthen banking linkages between India and Russia


Power

  1.  
MOU between NMDC Ltd. and OJSC Severstal for setting up a 50:50 joint venture for an integrated steel plant in Karnataka The MOU, signed on 10 December 2010, envisages setting up of a JV to build an integrated steel plant in Karnataka with a captive coal mining concession in Russia and iron ore mining concession in India.


Pharmaceuticals and Biopharmaceuticals

  1.  
Agreement between JSC “R-Pharm” and “Dr.Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.” The MOU envisages cooperation between the two companies in the areas of licensing, technology transfer, manufacturing and marketing of pharma products.
  1.  
Memorandum of Understanding between JSC “Pharmasyntez” and “Naprod Life Science Private Ltd.”
 
The MOU envisages joint production of modern oncological medicine in the Russian Federation and / or purchase of raw materials
  1.  
Agreement on scientific and technical co-operation between JSC ‘Arkihin” and “Biopharm” This Agreement will enable S&T cooperation between the two companies in the area of pharmaceuticals/biopharmaceuticals


Communications and IT

  1.  
Agreement on scientific co-operation between “Pereslavskij Technopark” and Asia Pacific Institute of  Information Technology This Agreement envisages scientific cooperation between the two institutes in the area of IT
  1.  
Memorandum of Understanding between JSC ‘Sitronics” and Shyam Telecom on joint promotion of telecom products in various markets This MOU envisages joint promotion of telecom products by the two companies in India, Russia and third countries
  1.  
Agreement between Federal network operator JSC “Navigation - Information Systems” and GLONIS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LTD This Agreement envisages introduction of GLONASS related services in India
  1.  
MoU between JSC Navigation-Information Systems and Kerla State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. This MOU envisages collaboration between the two organizations for undertaking joint projects in India.
  1.  
Agreement on GLONASS High Precision signal access to India This Agreement envisages Russia providing access to the GLONASS High Precision Navigation signals to India.
  1.  
MOU between TATA SONS and Skolkovo Foundation The MOU envisages joint R&D in high-tech innovations.


Chemicals and Petrochemicals

  1.  
JV Agreement between Reliance and Sibur (a subsidiary of Gazprom) for setting up a butyl rubber manufacturing facility in India The Agreement is for setting up a JV for manufacturing butyl rubber in Jamnagar. The project envisages Russian technology capabilities for India in this important sector.
  1.  
Memorandum of Understanding between “Pereslavskij Technopark” and Swastik Polymers" This MOU envisages joint production of Master Batches for polymers


New Delhi
December 21, 2010
(Source: http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530516905; accessed 21 Dec. 2010) 

Agreements signed during visit of the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao to India

Agreements signed during visit of the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao

December 16, 2010

Sl. No. Name of the MOU/Agreement Chinese Signatory Indian Signatory
1.
Programme of Cultural Exchange for the years 2010-2012 H.E. MR. CAI WU
Minister of Culture
SHRI S.M. KRISHNA
Hon’ble Minister of External Affairs
2
Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in Green Technologies MR. ZHU ZHIXIN
Deputy Minister of the National Development and Reform Commission
SHRI JAIRAM RAMESH
Hon’ble Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests
3
Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of External Affairs of the Republic of India and the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China on Media Exchanges H.E. MR. ZHANG YAN
Ambassador of China to India
SMT. NIRUPAMA RAO
Foreign Secretary
4
Memorandum of Understanding between the Ministry of Water Resources of the Republic of India and the Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China on Provision of Hydrological Data on the Sutlej River in Flood Season by China to India MR. HU ZHANGYUE
Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs
SHRI D.V. SINGH
Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources
5
Memorandum of Understanding between the Reserve Bank of India and the China Banking Regulatory Commission    MR. WANG ZHAOXING
Vice Chairman, China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC)
SMT SHYAMALA GOPINATH
Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India
6
Memorandum of Understanding between Export-Import Bank of India and China Development Bank Corporation MR. GAO  JIAN
Vice Governor, China Development Bank Corporation 
SHRI T.C.A. RANGANATHAN
Chairman & Managing Director, Export-Import Bank of India


New Delhi
December 16, 2010

(Source: http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530516882; accessed 21 Dec. 2010)

Agreements signed during the visit of the President of France to India

Agreements signed during the visit of the President of France

December 06, 2010

NAME/TITLE
INDIAN SIGNATORY
FRENCH SIGNATORY
Agreement on Film Co- Production between the Government of the Republic of India  and  the Government of the French Republic Smt. Ambika Soni, Minister for Information Broadcasting Mr. Frederic Mitterrand, Minister of Culture and Communication
Agreement between the Government of the French Republic and the Government of the Republic of India concerning Intellectual Property Rights
on the development of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy
Dr. Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission and Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy Mrs. Michèle Alliot-Marie, Minister for Foreign & European Affairs.  
Agreement  Between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the French Republic on the Protection of Confidentiality of Technical Data and Information Relating to Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Dr. Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission and Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy DAE Mrs. Kosciuszko-Morizet, Minister for Ecology, Sustainable Development, Transport and Housing.
Cooperation Agreement Between the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) of The Government Of India and the Commissariat A L’energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives(CEA) in the field of Nuclear Science and Technology for Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy Dr. Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission and Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy Dr. Bernard Bigot, Administrateur General, CEA
General Framework Agreement between NPCIL and AREVA for Implementation of EPR NPP Units at Jaitapur site, Maharashtra Dr. S.K. Jain, CMD, NPCIL Mrs. Anne Lauvergeon, CEO, AREVA
Early Works Agreement between NPCIL and AREVA for Implementation of EPR NPP Units at Jaitapur Site, Maharashtra Dr. S.K. Jain, CMD, NPCIL Mrs. Anne Lauvergeon, CEO, AREVA
Memorandum of Understanding
between the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and the Centre National D'études Spatiales (CNEc) for Cooperation in  Earth System Science and Climate
Dr. K. Radhakrishnan, Chairman, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Mr. Yannick d’Escatha, President, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)

New Delhi
December 6, 2010
(Source: http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530516769; accessed 21 Dec. 2010)

Thứ Hai, 20 tháng 12, 2010

Picture of the Day, December 21, 2010

Russian President arrives in India


Russian President Dmitry Medvedev is being received by Minister of State for External Affairs Preneet Kaur (left) after his arrival at the Indira Gandhi International Airport in New Delhi, early Tuesday
(Source: http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article967401.ece?homepage=true)

Thứ Năm, 16 tháng 12, 2010

Pictures of the day: 15 December 2010

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao arrives on 3-day state visit to India

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao being received by the Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Jyotiraditya Scindia on his arrival at the Air force Station Palam, in New Delhi on December 15, 2010 
(Source: http://netindian.in/sites/default/files/20101215Wen2.jpg)


 Đại diện chính phủ Ấn Độ đón Thủ tướng Trung Quốc Ôn Gia Bảo tại sân bay
(Source: http://vnexpress.net/GL/The-gioi/Phan-tich/2010/12/3BA2443E/)

Thứ Bảy, 11 tháng 12, 2010

Indian PM’s remarks at 5th East Asia Summit

PM’s remarks at the fifth East Asia Summit

October 30, 2010

I reaffirm India’s commitment to the East Asia Summit process. India’s engagement with South East and East Asia has been a pillar of our foreign policy since the 1990s. We have participated in each of the Summits and in the many sectoral meetings. India believes in the centrality of ASEAN’s role in the EAS process.

This is a special Summit, marking the 5th Anniversary of the East Asia Summit. The EAS has come a long way since its first meeting in Kuala Lumpur in December 2005. Today, it has become an integral part of the regional architecture and a purposeful vehicle for community building in the region.

The EAS process has over the years grappled with immediate challenges such as disaster management and pandemics and energy security in 2007, the global economic crisis in 2008 and the climate change negotiations in 2009. This is in addition to the ongoing task of creating structures and institutions which lead to the overall goal of forging a wider Asian community encompassing the economic, political, security, social, cultural and people-to-people spheres.
The economic weight is shifting in favour of Asia, and it is seen as the engine of global growth. It has weathered the global economic crisis well. The EAS process is creating prosperity in the region, and helping to bridge gaps between sub-regions and nations in Asia. We are on the right track.

The theme of the Summit - from vision to action - is most appropriate. We need to move from policy declarations to greater functional cooperation.

I welcome the entry of the United States and Russia as participants in the EAS process. The EAS will benefit from there experience while remaining an ASEAN-led process.

I would like to complement the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) for their work in promoting regional integration by providing useful research and practical policy recommendations on regional connectivity, trade, investment, energy and the environment. ERIA has submitted a report on the Comprehensive Asian Development Plan (CADP) and identified three corridors for building infrastructure, connectivity and industrial activity that will support the realization of a community in the region. One of these is for a Mekong – India Economic Corridor.
Thanks to the collective efforts of G-20, the world economy has gradually stabilized even though the recovery remains fragile. Growth in developing countries would be greatly helped if threats of new protectionist measures in industrialized countries are firmly resisted and existing barriers to trade are reduced. Towards this end, a successful completion of the Doha Development Round of trade negotiations is important.

India welcomes further progress on a Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement for East Asia (CEPEA) process. Till last year we had signed CEPA Agreements with Singapore and ROK and a Trade in Goods Agreement with the ASEAN. In the last one year we have completed negotiations on a CEPA with Japan and Malaysia. An Agreement on Trade in Services and Investment is under negotiation with the ASEAN.

Forthcoming G-20 Summit in Seoul should focus on development. I am happy that development has been included as an item for discussion.

Indian economy is expected to grow at the rate of 8.5% this year. We hope to achieve a growth rate of 9.10% next year. This will encourage two way trade between India and ASEAN Member States.
We welcome the first meeting of the ASEAN Defence Ministers Plus Eight in Hanoi earlier this month. India supports practical and pragmatic cooperation through this new forum by building trust and confidence among all countries. We believe that in a step by step process, at a pace comfortable to all, this forum can make a meaningful contribution to building open and transparent security architecture in the Asia-Pacific region.

Tackling the growing threats to security – non-State actors, security of sea-lanes, piracy, human trafficking, terrorism and protection of global commons – would require concerted response.

At the 4th East Asia Summit, EAS member countries had supported the establishment of the University as a non-state, non-profit, secular and self-governing international institution to bring together the brightest and the best in East Asia. I am happy to report that the Nalanda University Bill has been passed by both Houses of the Indian Parliament earlier this year. The Nalanda Mentor Group (headed by Nobel Laureate Dr. Amartya Sen) will act as the interim Governing Board of the University till such time as the members of the Governing Board have been nominated. The statutes of the University are being drafted. Land has been acquired for the University. We invite EAS member countries to participate in the Nalanda University project. I hope that Nalanda University will be an important element in the community that we hope to build in the East Asian region.

India supports a collaborative approach to energy issues. Our present energy policy involves adopting a multi-pronged strategy by broadening our energy mix, including nuclear energy.
We want positive outcome in Cancun at the 16th Conference of Parties. It should build upon the Copenhagen Accord. India is doing everything possible within the limitation of her own resources to contribute to the global action on climate change. Under our ambitious National Action Plan on Climate Change, we have embarked upon measures to improve energy efficiency, reduce energy intensity and enhance the share of renewable energy in the energy mix.

We listened with great interest to remarks of the President of the Asian Development Bank. In near future, we believe that Asia’s growth and intra-ASEAN trade can make an important contribution to global recovery.

Hanoi
October 30, 2010

(Source: http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530116615; Accessed 12 Dec. 2010)

Indian PM's Statement at 8th ASEAN-India Summit

Prime Minister’s statement at the 8th India-ASEAN Summit

October 30, 2010

I thank you, Mr. Prime Minister, for your warm welcome and generous hospitality. It is a pleasure for all of us to gather here on the auspicious occasion of the commemoration of 1000 years of the establishment of the city of Hanoi.

I deeply condole the loss of lives and property in the recent tsunami in Indonesia and floods in Vietnam. I wish the people of Indonesia and Vietnam an early recovery from the unfortunate tragedy.

I thank Cambodia, and especially Prime Minister Hun Sen, for his strong support to India as country Coordinator and look forward to our continuing close association with Cambodia.

For the past five years the achievement of the India-ASEAN partnership has been to initiate cooperation in a diverse range of sectors covering political and security ties, economic cooperation and the promotion of socio-cultural links.

I commend the officials of both sides for developing a Plan of Action to implement the ASEAN-India Partnership for Peace, Progress and Shared Prosperity for the years 2010-2015. It is an ambitious road map and the 82 Action Points reflect the vast potential and desire to develop a multi-faceted India-ASEAN relationship.
Our experience of implementation shows that we need to work very hard at all levels if we have to accelerate the pace of engagement as outlined in the Plan of Action. I recall that the theme of the ASEAN Summit this year is “Vision to Action”. This theme is equally appropriate for our own partnership.

I invite the ASEAN Secretary General Dr. Surin Pitsuwan to visit India to review the mechanisms and procedures in place so that the pace of implementing agreed projects can be speeded up.

I would urge that the two sides make further efforts to identify concrete projects for cooperation under the India-ASEAN Science & Technology Fund, India-ASEAN Green Fund and the US $ 50 million India-ASEAN Fund announced last year.

Excellencies,

India believes that ASEAN is the core around which the process of economic integration of the Asia-Pacific region should be built. India’s economy has been growing rapidly for the past few years. This year we hope to achieve a growth rate of 8.5%. In the coming years, we hope to sustain a growth rate of 9-10% per year which will offer many opportunities for trade and investment. Our government has undertaken programmes for a massive transformation of rural India that is creating a huge and booming rural market for goods and services.

We hope that all formalities for implementing the India-ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement by all ASEAN States are completed at an early date. The conclusion of a Services and Investment Agreement will be an important step in our goal of comprehensive economic cooperation.
In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in people to people exchanges as a result of better air connectivity between India and ASEAN. More than 3 million Indian tourists visit ASEAN every year and about 380 flights connect Indian and ASEAN cities every week. This is well below the potential.

Excellencies

We invite many more tourists from the ASEAN countries to visit India to see the splendor of its rich cultural heritage. I am happy that the text of the ASEAN-India MoU for cooperation in Tourism has been finalized. I am also pleased to note that ASEAN will soon establish an ASEAN Promotional Chapter for tourism in Mumbai.

As a concrete measure, I am happy to announce that we will extend our visa on arrival facility to nationals of Cambodia, Vietnam, Philippines and Laos with effect from 1st of January 2011.
We have always accorded high priority to the countries covered by the “Initiative for ASEAN integration”. We hope to upgrade the level of youth exchanges as well as establish Vocational Training Centres in each of these countries.
Connectivity is another important area of our cooperation. As a further measure to support the ASEAN Master Plan on Connectivity, we will offer 100 IT scholarships to each of the 10 ASEAN countries over the next 5 years.

Science & Technology should be another focus area for our cooperation. We are ready to set up a Centre for Tracking and Data Reception and an Imaging facility for the ASEAN countries. This Centre would utilize data provided by Indian remote sensing satellites and harness it for multiple developmental applications. I propose a meeting of the heads of our space agencies in India which could work out exact details of cooperation.

Our cooperation in political and security matters is progressing well, including through expanded bilateral exchanges. These are important areas of our cooperation not only because of the common threats that we face but also because such cooperation helps to built mutual trust and understanding.

India looks forward to hosting the commemorative India-ASEAN Summit in India in the year 2012. This will be a land mark event and we must begin preparations early. The Eminent Persons Group should be set up quickly so that it can formulate a vision statement towards a long term strategic partnership between ASEAN and India that could be the theme of the Summit.

Thank you.

Hanoi
October 30, 2010

(Source: http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=530116614; Accessed 12 Dec. 2010)